App Project Rubric

Criteria	Level One	Level Two	Level Three	Level Four
App Report (assignment on Sakai)	Few of the sections of the report are present and/or not in proper order.	Most sections of the report are present and in order.	All sections of the report are present and in correct order.	All sections of the report are present and in correct order including an introduction, and the writing is clear and effective.
Concept of App	App is poorly conceived in terms of usefulness, marketability.	App is generally ok, but we would have hoped for something more elaborate for a university course.	App is generally solid, but could be significantly better with some minor changes.	App is well conceived and has the potential to become quite popular.
Graphical Design of App	App is poorly designed. Aesthetically unpleasant.	Aesthetics of App are generally ok, but appear amateurish.	Aesthetics are quite good, but not quite of professional quality.	Aesthetics of App are of professional quality.
Functionality of App (Coding)	App does not work.	App works, but is either simple or has glitches.	App works well and has no glitches; coding is impressive.	App works well, has no glitches, and clearly has advanced coding.